Accountant's case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Accountants - subject bea Study ExampleHe was advised that it would be possible to absorb his existing machines upgraded so that they could complete more complicated programmes and decided to go ahead with this. In March Blake received a nib from Watt A. randomness plc, a company specialising in computer maintenance and upgrading of a variety of several(predicate) computers including his Apropex X18s. This circular contained details of the cost of upgrading and at the bottom of the first page there was a cinema of a small red hand together with the words see last page in feint black print. On the final page of this six page circular, in a substitution position, there was a box containing the following wordsThe Company undertakes no responsibility of any mixture for any loss damage, injury or depreciation in value arising (regardless of cause) during maintenance or upgrading operations. Customers are advised to take start independent insurance. Blake was impressed at the re asonable charges quoted and failed to notice this clause. He immediately telephoned Racket plc and engaged their services to upgrade three computers. He was told that a confirmation of his disposition would be sent immediately. The confirmation, which Blake read, arrived the following day and stated that All work is subject to conditions set out in the companys circular. When Racket plc came to collect the computers, one of them was dropped onto Blakes foot by a Racket employee. The entropy computer was destroyed by a fire at the warehouse, which was started inadvertently by another Racket employee, and the third computer was returned with an irreparable defect and cannot be used by Blake.According to general rules of distill law pertaining to offer, bridal and consideration it can be said that if A makes a proposal to B it will be considered as an offer extended from A to B and if B says yes to the offer do by A then the offer will be considered as legitimate. The offer will flat be called as a Promise in issueual terms and A will be called the promisor and B who has accepted the offer/proposal will be called the promisee. According to Atiyah,Essays on contract(1986) Consideration is the doctrine to establish which promises should be licitly enforceable. Also in Currie v. Misa(1875)L.R.10Ex.153,at p.162 Lush J. stated A valuable consideration, in the sense of the law, may comprise in some right, interest, profit, or benefit accruing to the one party, or some forbearance, detriment, loss, or responsibility given, suffered, or undertaken by the other. Every promise and every set of promises, forming the consideration for each other, is an agreement and afterwards it culminates in to contract. Consent given should always be free consent in terms of that it should not have been obtained through any fraud, by employing coercion, exerting undue influence or through misrepresentation of facts. These basic rules of offer, acceptance and invitation to share etc are amply illustrated in the cases Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v. Boots Cash Chemicals Ltd.(1952)2 Q.B.795 and Felthouse v. Bindley(1862)6L.T.157 and also in Fisher v. cost (1961) 1Q.B. 394 The acceptance must assent unequivocally and without qualification to the terms of the offer. The acceptance may also be qualified by reference to the preparation of a more formal contract or by reference to terms, which have still to be negotiated.In this case as it appears on the face of it that Blake on the sending of circular by Watt A that can be taken as invitation to treat offered them to buy computers from them, that the company accepted subject to some terms and conditions. So broadly construing the terms of the contract it seems that they bind Blake. Especially in view of Thompson v. London, Midland and Scottish Ry. Co. 1930 1