Discussion 1 Week 10 Protests, Disputes, and Appeals Assignment

Discussion 1 Week 10 Protests, Disputes, and Appeals - Assignment Example ts of both, agreement and disagreement; and (d) the â€Å"statement of the contracting officer’s decision, with supporting rationale† (OConnor, 2007, p. 234). Concurrently, depending on the type of claim (for money, for interpretation of contract terms, and for ‘other relief’), diverse conditions and requirements are to be complied. Each of the requirement is an independent critical component of a successful claim because all crucial ingredients to support the requirement need to be duly complied prior to proceeding to the claim process. 2. Evaluate the requirements for the Court of Federal Claims to hear a complaint and give your opinion on which requirements are justified, which are not, and which additional requirements would be advisable. Explain what, in your opinion, makes these requirements justifiable or not justifiable. (United States Court of Federal Claims, 2014). For instance, the reference to the exact terms of the contract where the claim or dispute originated need to be stated verbatim to extrapolate the validity of the complaint. As such, all the stipulated elements, by nature of evaluation and experience in processing claims, have already been scrutinized as to their necessity to be integrated in the claim process. In one’s personal opinion, all the requirements are therefore justifiable to establish comprehensive validity in supporting the rationale for the

Creating a hypothesis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Creating a hypothesis - Essay Example The group was asked to answer 3 questions. 1. Before the video, what was their opinion on abortions and what reason confirmed this belief?. 2. Do religion or science hold the most weight in your answer and to give a reason to confirm this opinion? 3. Did your opinion on abortions change after viewing the video and what in specific made them confirm their answer? The video was watched simultaneously by all five participants and the conductor of the focus group. Immediately after the viewing, the questionnaire was issued out for the questions to be answered. The testing sample exposed that initially, 4 out of 5 of the viewers believed that abortion should be legal prior to watching the video. The 1 individual who did not believe that abortion should be legal was a man. The primary confirmation answer was the fact that it was a personal choice and government should not be allowed to tell a woman what to do with her body. The sole participant that believed that abortion should not be legal based his answer upon the idea that life began at conception and it was a form of murder. The 2nd question answered by the sampled group as to weather science or religion held the most weight in there answer was 3 for religion and 2 for science. The 3 polled that felt as if religion held the most weight in their answer confirmed themselves to be Christian and said that they knew of nothing in the Bible that stated that they should not have an abortion. The 2 that answered science confirmed that the zygote would not be able to survive on its own outside of the womb. The 3rd and final question of the poll asked if their opinion about abortions was swayed after watching the video. The response remained the same. 4 of the participants still believed in abortion with the same 1 individual remaining constant to the answer that abortion should be illegal. Asked to confirm their answers, the general notion was that they were aware of the development